Skip to main content

WHY DO PRIESTS/DEACONS VEIL THEIR HANDS WHEN CARRYING THE BLESSED SACRAMENT IN THE MONSTRANCE

In the spirit of the celebration of Christ the king of the universe. I felt it is necessary to share this because a little girl asked me on Sunday why i used my hand to insert the sacred species in the monstrance and I have to use  a veil to carry the monstrance.

Then she asked which is more important the golden monstrance or the blessed sacrament

Fr. Chinaka Justin Mbaeri, OSJ raised this pertinent question which i will like to share with you.

He asked "WHY DO PRIESTS/DEACONS VEIL THEIR HANDS WHEN CARRYING THE BLESSED SACRAMENT IN THE MONSTRANCE"

Many Catholics don't really understand what we do and why we do that hence its ok if we share some of what we do in the Catholic church so that we can have a better understanding and perhaps do what we do with conviction that is rational

Fr Justin said in his response I used to think like you even up to being a seminarian until I read a commentary (a brief booklet) on the "Caeremoniale Romarum" in my 2nd year Theology, then the whole matter became clear to me.

Wait a minute, let us reason together  if a priest is capable (by the power of God) to consecrate the Bread and Wine into the body and blood of Christ with his bare hands, and even at benediction, he touches the most precious body of Christ and places it in the lunet, then fixes it in the Monstrance/Ostensorium. If this is so, why then must he use a veil to lift up the Monstrance containing the Blessed Sacrament? Is it a sign of respect? If yes, why does he touch the Sacred Host with his hands in the first place? What exactly is he portraying? Apparently, the hands of the priest are not unworthy to touch the Body of Christ or even the golden monstrance which bears Him. In order to understand this, we have to first understand the essence of Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.

First, we must note that a priest is ordained to bless and consecrate the people of God with his hands, that is why one without hands cannot be ordained, he's said to have a canonical impediment. Thus, the hands of the priest are consecrated at Ordination.

Apart from blessing the people of God, there's a special moment reserved for Christ Himself to bless his people. This moment is called *Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament*

During the Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament (as it is called) "the Blessing of Christ", it is not the priest who blesses or acts, neither does he act or blesses in the person of Christ, no, it is Christ himself (the true Priest) who acts and blesses at that very moment He's exposed on the altar. Therefore, in order to illustrate that the priest is not blessing the people, he covers (hides) his hands (used for blessing) with a humeral veil (humurus means “shoulder” so a humeral veil is a “should veil”).
Thus, once the hands of the priests ain't seen, it would be understood that he's not the one blessing the people but Christ himself.

Therefore, at benediction, adoration, or during the procession of "Corpus Christi" (an offshoot of benediction), the priest carries the Blessed Sacrament in procession with his hands hidden, while the blessings of Christ continue to radiate in all its rays towards the people (as seen in the shape of the monstrance). It is Christ himself who goes about in procession blessing his people, and not the hands of the priest.

Thank you so much Fr Justin
May God bless you and your ministry

Comments

  1. That is great. Didn't understand why, until this explicit information. Tanx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wao thanks Padre for sharing. I have read it before but your explanation makes it clearer for proper understanding. Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great job Fr Lawrence, you are right . God bless you

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SIMONY IN THE CHURCH: Lessons from histories and stories.

The influx of Pentecostal practise and attitude are creeping into the Catholic Church and if we are not careful, her trademarks of orthodoxy and authenticity will be at the margins. Evidently, many aberrations are finding their ways to the front seat and it is disheartening how strange doctrines are celebrated and enthroned in modern fashion with personal innovations in the liturgy. What is happening to the rubrics, can we go back to the root and the books? This piece is a clarion call to my dear brothers and sisters, a wake-up call to all Catholics to protect the faith we proudly profess and keep out ‘rugalised’ doctrines infiltrating into the parishes. Personally, I am shocked with much pain in my heart on how priests and lay faithful play active parts in keeping the floodgates of error into devotional life of the church. The Catechesis of the church must not sleep nor slumber to checkmate some of the excesses we find around. Can you Imagine a situation when someone brought an O

HOW OLD IS MARY TODAY ?

  This question was raised during the celebration of the Nativity of mother Mary in 2021 at mass. Let's go into history to unravel how old she would had celebrated if she was physically with us today 8th September 2024.  Some apocryphal accounts state that at the time of her betrothal to Joseph, Mary was 12–14 years old. According to ancient Jewish custom, Mary could have been betrothed at about 12. Hyppolitus of Thebes says that Mary lived for 11 years after the death of her son Jesus, dying in 41 AD. Some ancient authors said that she gave birth to Jesus at 16. Now let's calculate  Jesus lived 30 years with Mary and worked for 3 years with his apostles meaning he died at 33. Hence 16 +33 + 2024 = 2073 So we arrived at her age with historical information from the Sacred tradition that could only be found in the Catholic Church  Am proud to be a Catholic  Happy 2073th  birthday to mother Mary Fr law SDV

A Summary on Evangelii Nuntiandi 1975

A Summary on Evangelii Nuntiandi 1975 Pope Paul VI on December 1975 wrote to the Episcopate, Clergy and to all the faithful of the entire world on evangelization in the modern world. In his introductory part he emphasized that ,the condition of the society in which we live oblige us to seek for a new method on how to bring the Gospel message to the modern man, he explained that evangelization is not an occasional or temporary task but a permanent and constitutive necessity of the church, he therefore, called on all (cleric and lay faithful) to meditate and re-evaluate the three pertinent questions; “in our days what has happened to that hidden energy of the Good News, which is able to have a powerful effect on man’s conscience?, To what extent and in what way is that evangelical force capable of really transforming the people of this century?, What method should be followed in order that the power of the Gospel may have its effect?. The whole mission of Christ is summed up in the Go